(24-06-2026, 09:50 PM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think the statistics part is mainly for your benefit as the solver.This won't give us much of a clue. The model that fits the encryption method I described is incredibly simple. Even if we try to adjust it endlessly, it won't make much of a difference.
(24-06-2026, 09:50 PM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I don't mind if you spend the next 3-5-30 years refining and building the numeric cipher case only to find that this is a dead endI'm not an expert, and my conclusions may not be accurate, and it's likely that if I take on this job, I won't get anything. However, this does not mean that the nomenclator theory is futile or unsuitable.
We can try to model the numbers used using the derived character weights, we can check the interchangeability of the characters to determine the two-digit numbers (we can also check their two-digit nature to see if they replace a letter or an abbreviated part of a word), and then we can determine the boundaries between the numbers... This will certainly enrich our knowledge of the manuscript.

