23-06-2026, 06:22 PM
The second attempt to determine the weights of the symbols.
I measured it using the same methods, i.e. according to statistics, "is the symbol x more often placed before or after the symbol y?". But this time, more characters have already been taken.
If we divide the symbols into groups and summarize the readings of their weights, we get the following (group names are conditional):
Some remarkable ratios:
1). ch's more than a dozens of them, but fewer gallows. Also, ch's more than o.
2). x is more than a dozen (if a = ei)
3). Although y is often found at the beginning of words, voynichese.com shows that y stands at the beginning in 2203 cases, and at the end - 15496. I think the difference is sufficient.
4). There are several words in the manuscript containing two gallows, and I deduced the relationships within their group thanks to them. But I could be wrong.
5). In the category with the symbol q, you can enter c, which has the property of standing in front of gallows (I mean cases like ct, not cth)
6). It is difficult to determine the weight of s, but I assume that it is the largest in the fozens group, as well as more than ch.
7). The symbols in the unit group are conditionally equal to each other.
8). There are cases when the letter y comes after n in a word, which suggests to me that it may be the "second unit", i.e. it may also be equal to 1, but in the case of rows of units, for some reason, it stands only after them. Maybe that's 0,5?
I measured it using the same methods, i.e. according to statistics, "is the symbol x more often placed before or after the symbol y?". But this time, more characters have already been taken.
If we divide the symbols into groups and summarize the readings of their weights, we get the following (group names are conditional):
Some remarkable ratios:
1). ch's more than a dozens of them, but fewer gallows. Also, ch's more than o.
2). x is more than a dozen (if a = ei)
3). Although y is often found at the beginning of words, voynichese.com shows that y stands at the beginning in 2203 cases, and at the end - 15496. I think the difference is sufficient.
4). There are several words in the manuscript containing two gallows, and I deduced the relationships within their group thanks to them. But I could be wrong.
5). In the category with the symbol q, you can enter c, which has the property of standing in front of gallows (I mean cases like ct, not cth)
6). It is difficult to determine the weight of s, but I assume that it is the largest in the fozens group, as well as more than ch.
7). The symbols in the unit group are conditionally equal to each other.
8). There are cases when the letter y comes after n in a word, which suggests to me that it may be the "second unit", i.e. it may also be equal to 1, but in the case of rows of units, for some reason, it stands only after them. Maybe that's 0,5?