Voynich's anatomy

[ololololo]

A quick search online would allow you to understand whether you are confirming or refuting the proposals of your predecessors.

I have made a similar post once:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

And in that thread Ruby also gave the exact same answer as in this one   if you know a quick google search gives the results, why not take the results from such a search and provide them to the forum and discuss them in the context of this post? Not everyone is able to search the entire debate around the VMS for the last 100 years for every topic, especially if their native language is not english. And obviously, the forum search requires you to guess the exact words used in previous threads, so eventually people only know about the threads because they remember reading them, not because they are searchable. 

New researchers are almost certainly going to cover aleady covered ground with their ideas, because they have reasonable ideas. They shouldn't have to thouroughly cross check their ideas and do a differential analysis of their idea against the entire history of VMS discussion to talk about it. Unless the idea is something like "i think the VMS is about herbs".


As for those images representing body function, are there any examples of similar metaphors being used in any cultures? From what i've seen, body imagery in general tends to be quite literal.

Yes, some of the illustrations resemble organs (e.g., the heart, brain, and phallus).
There is an anatomy book that also shows the organs in a blurred state - this is Mansur's Anatomy. It is not encrypted, and the illustrations are not suitable for comparison.