08-11-2016, 08:45 PM
(08-11-2016, 08:40 PM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(08-11-2016, 05:40 PM)stellar wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(08-11-2016, 05:04 PM)Witch Mountain wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.That is fair most dear Stellar. I think the point that is being made (correct me if I am wrong dear Thomas) is this:
If this numerology system can produce words in any language - Welsh German Chinese etc. - then it may be too loose: anyone can find anything they're looking for.
If you think John Dee wrote the manuscript, and I think it's a Chinese work, and the numerology system says we're both right at the same time, then something may be wrong with the system.
You have to remember that Chinese is more of a symbolic language and syllabic language. And as you can see Latin letters were used in the translation of Chinese. Chinese symbols cannot be used in Pythagorean number system.
Stellar, you missed the point.
People are saying that if the system works for a variety of languages (Chinese was only an example), then you have to suspect that it is the system (the underlying theory) that is at fault.
You are right it has to be in one language and I'm looking into a combined counting system at the moment for one language, We shall see. Keep your fingers crossed this could be big.
