Hoax theory discovery by running lang analysis program according to my methodology

[ReneZ]

But the paper that launched this ship casts serious doubt on the idea that there is even a strict algorithm to be found.

I agree with this point. 

A strict algorithm could be found if it involved not generating a meaningless text on the fly, but a transformation of a meaningful text. And this may still be only in theory.

To use a parallel: 
homophonic ciphers are substitution ciphers where (among other things) the encoder has a choice, for each character, between several code symbols. He can pick one at will.
This means that, when having the code table available, the encoding is non-deterministic, while the decoding is fully deterministic. The encoding is stilll strict, in a way, but it will not be possible to set up a machine that creates the same cipher text as any known (historical) example.

Setting up such a machine, that successfully emulates the human behaviour in spite of this problem, is not proof of method. I rather see it as evidence for successful tuning to the result.