31-05-2026, 10:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 31-05-2026, 11:06 PM by anyasophira.)
Is this to prove gibberish or prove meaning ? Just curious.
Also-First data set - Take a body of texts they might have had access too, ideal assumption, texts plausibly available to a Central European scribe in the early 15th century, Latin herbals, Arabic medical texts, Hebrew manuscripts, and similar period-appropriate works.
That first data set your describing sounds incredible- but “take a body of texts” makes it sound like there are hundreds of transcribed manuscripts out there with corrected ocr and correct abbreviations ready to process. Texts in Latin, local dialects , Hebrew, etc. Unless I am mistaken- this is the actual
Work that takes time and must be done carefully. Your step one is more like step 1-100. Just because a lot of manuscripts have pictures online doesn’t mean the text and ready to process.
Also-First data set - Take a body of texts they might have had access too, ideal assumption, texts plausibly available to a Central European scribe in the early 15th century, Latin herbals, Arabic medical texts, Hebrew manuscripts, and similar period-appropriate works.
That first data set your describing sounds incredible- but “take a body of texts” makes it sound like there are hundreds of transcribed manuscripts out there with corrected ocr and correct abbreviations ready to process. Texts in Latin, local dialects , Hebrew, etc. Unless I am mistaken- this is the actual
Work that takes time and must be done carefully. Your step one is more like step 1-100. Just because a lot of manuscripts have pictures online doesn’t mean the text and ready to process.