Voynich is encrypted ENOCH

[eggyk]

This will soon become clear, there are more explanations, just like with the lost book of Enoch. At the beginning of 2026 it was claimed here that it could not have been known at that time and today I have already listed several sources of information that admit that it could have been available. Another answer is that it is necessary to revise the current date of origin of the VM. And another possibility is that this picture is not the only one. Many manuscripts are still in private collections. I recently discovered at auction the first and second books of Enoch in the Ethiopian language from 1450. You are very quickly done with everything and that is a shame.

I am not done with everything, I am simply trying to validate what you are claiming and checking whether it makes sense. In order for this to be discussed, there needs to be a clear idea of what your theory is. The issue currently is that there isn't a coherent/consistent view for where, when and how the VMS can be the book of enoch. If you are claiming that the "bathtub" in the ethiopian manuscript is the same as what is depicted in the VMS, you have to also explain how that can reasonably be the case. 

Perhaps the 1700AD example is a copy from an older book from the 15th century, but there is no evidence of that. Perhaps the VMS was a far later copy of the 1700AD image, which means that you need a plausible story that explains why 15th century parchment was used in the 18th century. 

Just like every other theory on this forum, these types of questions aren't meant to disprove your theory, but to actually clarify it (if you have the answers). If you currently do not know the answer yet, that is completely fine, but in that case it would be wiser to bring up the possibility of a connection instead of stating that they are connected.