I have been looking at folio 49v for some time now. But, tonight I just stared at it till I came up with a solution and my cipher is the solution to the VMS with a 100% result. As most of you know there is a number column to the left of the glyph column which reads 1-5 and then the glyph column which descends next to the paragraphs. Using proper math associated with my cipher for these glyph’s in the tabbed margins they add up together to be 156 which is the same for the vord count on this page. The total in the first column is 73 and the next column for the other two paragraphs is 83. So to my pleasure there was a system to the madness on this page J
![[Image: f49v1.png]](https://voynichnumerology.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/f49v1.png)
![[Image: numerologychart16.jpg]](https://voynichnumerology.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/numerologychart16.jpg)
I also want to add the entropy count which I found by just playing around with a new set of glyph’s that I designed for the challenge for JKP’s paragraph. From just one paragraph starting out it is a near match to the VMS.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I have to agree with Rene that the VMS does suffer from low entropy. What I noticed when I enciphered a paragraph from JKP's site using a number system is that when I hit the picture I could simply lower the character count yet it still would equal the vord number. Also notice that when I used the Pythagorean number system table I managed to make it look like a language in just 1 paragraph thus having a frequency set.
Using this system it quite easy to shorten long words and still maintain the look and feel of a language. The system I use is kinda of a grill like Gordon Rugg suggests.
An interesting comparison would be is to know the average length of a voynich vord and compare with my little paragraph to see if I'm on to something. Another fact is that the Voynich Manuscript could be a copy of another book as it was easy for me to just make up glyph's and use the Pythagorean table.
Just looking at my paragraph it would seem that I have almost an exact match for 5.5 average.
let me do some math![[Image: smile.png]](http://www.voynich.ninja/images/smilies/smile.png)
Here is my calculation for the paragraph.
1(8 letter word) 1 (7 letter word) 7(6 letter words) 6 (5 letter words) 8 ( 4 letter words) 9 ( 3 letter words) 13 ( 2 letter words) 7 (1 letter words)
52 total vords
52/1 + 52/1 + 52/7 + 52/6 + 52/8 + 52/9 + 52/13 + 52/7
___________________________________________________= 5.22 average
8
As you can see just from a simple sample, I'm almost dead on to the Voynich Manuscript! Maybe there is something to be said about math and language combined and some sort of universal thinking using the two.
![[Image: f49v1.png]](https://voynichnumerology.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/f49v1.png)
![[Image: numerologychart16.jpg]](https://voynichnumerology.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/numerologychart16.jpg)
I also want to add the entropy count which I found by just playing around with a new set of glyph’s that I designed for the challenge for JKP’s paragraph. From just one paragraph starting out it is a near match to the VMS.
Quote: The average word length for voynich glyph's is 5.5.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I have to agree with Rene that the VMS does suffer from low entropy. What I noticed when I enciphered a paragraph from JKP's site using a number system is that when I hit the picture I could simply lower the character count yet it still would equal the vord number. Also notice that when I used the Pythagorean number system table I managed to make it look like a language in just 1 paragraph thus having a frequency set.
Using this system it quite easy to shorten long words and still maintain the look and feel of a language. The system I use is kinda of a grill like Gordon Rugg suggests.
An interesting comparison would be is to know the average length of a voynich vord and compare with my little paragraph to see if I'm on to something. Another fact is that the Voynich Manuscript could be a copy of another book as it was easy for me to just make up glyph's and use the Pythagorean table.
Just looking at my paragraph it would seem that I have almost an exact match for 5.5 average.
let me do some math
![[Image: smile.png]](http://www.voynich.ninja/images/smilies/smile.png)
Here is my calculation for the paragraph.
1(8 letter word) 1 (7 letter word) 7(6 letter words) 6 (5 letter words) 8 ( 4 letter words) 9 ( 3 letter words) 13 ( 2 letter words) 7 (1 letter words)
52 total vords
52/1 + 52/1 + 52/7 + 52/6 + 52/8 + 52/9 + 52/13 + 52/7
___________________________________________________= 5.22 average
8
As you can see just from a simple sample, I'm almost dead on to the Voynich Manuscript! Maybe there is something to be said about math and language combined and some sort of universal thinking using the two.
