27-04-2026, 11:32 AM
(26-04-2026, 08:55 PM)oeesordy wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Yes in the past due to my obsession I have been all over the map with the Voynich Manuscript. The manuscript is complex. If you take your time and read every post in this thread of mine you will see that it Wilfred Voynich used 11th and 15th century deception to weave his story. He went to a library to do this. There are several star charts I have explained through out this thread which have a deep connection with my cipher and the imagery. They show the nature of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. that Wilfred employed; they were viral in 1907-9 MS-408. Yes my past is filled with misinterpretation, however that does not take away from this post, any of those books are out of publishing. I admit I have been fooled by the forger many times but not now.
Okay, I took my time and read your posts.
You replied twice to me, but not to my point that the carbon dating of the parchment categorically refutes that the author of the VMS wrote about a supernova in 1005AD at the time like you claimed You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. If you have since changed that part of your theory, then this thread has also been filled with misinterpretation.
Furthermore, your post You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. about supposed V, M, and supposed "Wilfred" and "Wojnicz" are worrying, as neither are there. You also gave an equation for the circumference of a circle, for what I assume is for no reason? Just fyi, circles and semi circles used in diagrams aren't exactly rare since, well, forever. In almost every culture, western european, eastern european, Asian, Islamic, African, Semitic or otherwise. But Voynich "loves semi circles". Okay.
Also, the whole underpinning of your theory and its interpretations are based on a system of 1-1 substitution using a frequency chart of Latin. I note that the list includes V and U as different letters, when they used to be the same letter. What is your justification for this if the text is NOT latin? The letter frequency for speaking in tongues, even one with latin mixed in, will certainly NOT share Latin letter frequency. So, as needed, you decide which words are gibberish (tongues) and which are meaningful, depending on what you find and whether you can make it work. This is not reproducible and is entirely subjective. For example, in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. you point to a y and state something like "look, novem is next to november!".
Well, y is literally everywhere in the VMS. It's also next to aberil and octebre, but you don't use those examples as they are not convenient.
I also somehow missed your link to the Harry Potter subreddit, which you seem to be taking as evidence of parseltongue/VMS language to have a dark secret?? You do understand what parceltongue is, right? Are you aware of what it is?