Conlang, Glossolalia, daiin pronounced

[eggyk]

The Arizona AMS Laboratory radio carbon dated the Shroud of Turin which is 200 years off in a sample and the Voynich which is 60 years off in a sample.  However I'm claiming it to be 400 years off so who is wrong and right?  Maybe f68 is two hundred years off according too Rene Zandbergen.  This is not an exact science folks.

You are wrong, and the carbon dating is right.

Carbon dating isn't exact, but it isn't just off by 400 years here and there. That's not how it works. There are error margins statistically baked into the process, along with well known historical C14 measurements that help calibrate the age. 

Even if you doubt the final range of dates that were calculated using statistics (as I do), the dating of the individual sheets do NOT align with the year 1005AD. There is simply no chance of that being the case.

To be extremely clear, according to the data there is a 0% chance of a date from 1005AD. The absolutely oldest it could technically possibly be is from around ~1300AD. The oldest it could reasonably be is ~1350AD, although this would still be very unlikely.