17-04-2026, 11:19 AM
It seems very reasonable to me. Proving it definitely may be hard though.
In 1650 VM still had original cover (or maybe not original at all???).
Shame that it was replaced in the 19th century by Jesuits without any documentation what was done and how it looked like.
If the letter was somehow to the manuscript then it was probably attached to that original cover and you may not find traces of attachment on the manuscript in its current state
In 1650 VM still had original cover (or maybe not original at all???).
Shame that it was replaced in the 19th century by Jesuits without any documentation what was done and how it looked like.
If the letter was somehow to the manuscript then it was probably attached to that original cover and you may not find traces of attachment on the manuscript in its current state