16-04-2026, 08:51 PM
Must admit that I am not sure what „in tongues“ is supposed to mean; is it like babbling something?
So in total, your idea is that there are a few Latin words in Voynichese which gave you a key for character conversions, and all of the rest is „anything else“.
You see in „mv?“ from a small marginalia (which may or may not have any relation to the orginal script) a code for the year 1006, up to 430 years before VMS.
What texts can this understanding produce in a translation?
And yes, old manuscripts could have been an original author‘s work as well as a copy of some books being centuries or even millenials older — but why is the supernova information „hidden“ in such way and at a place where it can hardly be believed to belong to this script?
Do you see any doubts about your theory?
So in total, your idea is that there are a few Latin words in Voynichese which gave you a key for character conversions, and all of the rest is „anything else“.
You see in „mv?“ from a small marginalia (which may or may not have any relation to the orginal script) a code for the year 1006, up to 430 years before VMS.
What texts can this understanding produce in a translation?
And yes, old manuscripts could have been an original author‘s work as well as a copy of some books being centuries or even millenials older — but why is the supernova information „hidden“ in such way and at a place where it can hardly be believed to belong to this script?
Do you see any doubts about your theory?