(13-04-2026, 07:13 AM)CorwinFr wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Real herbal roots: 55%. Random words of same lengths: 25% mean. p = 0.004.
This is not a valid method: the null hypothesis is not that the first words of paragraphs are random. It is well known that the first lines of paragraphs are special, and the first words of lines are special, see PAAFU, LAAFU studies. By "special" I mean statistically different, the first character mostly but not only, also much frequent gallows in the words of the first line and especially on the first word: they are certainly not "random" words.
You are again trusting your overconfident AI to do the work for you: you should know better and stop wasting everyone's time with unsupported theories. This is why AI theories are banned: people who are too lazy to create their own theories are also too lazy to check them by themselves, they blindly trust the AI to come up with theory, code, and results and just copy-paste the mass of hallucinated or badly supported claims verbatim to the forum. I noticed that you did exactly that in this thread, then deleted most of them (good) but it turns out that even the most reasonable-looking claim is deeply flawed.