Conlang, Glossolalia, daiin pronounced

[oeesordy]

Hi oeesordy

I'm not sure if I understood everything correctly But here are my thoughts on it...

Isn't that a break in the internal logic?
Either d->N (letter) OR d->“Oct” (numeral), but both at will?

Glossolalia as an explanation naturally leads nowhere: If nonsense is the expected result, any substitution can be “confirmed.” Just as a side note: According to previous statistical studies, purely spoken glossolalia can never maintain a structurally rigid system like the one we see in VMS—especially not over 200 pages.

Even if it’s not supposed to make sense, still: Frequency-rank matching between VMS and Latin is known to have failed: The VMS frequency distribution is structurally different from Latin (too few rare letters, too many frequent glyph clusters). This has been tested many times.

But, as I said, I’m not sure if I understood you correctly.

I think they used "Oct", as I see a four in there as well.  It's not in the Latin Language although they I believe they used a Latin frequency table to help construct vocal words in a dictionary that don't make sense.  There is the possibility of a few Latin words in the Voynich I imagine.  Well it's constructed so maybe they were trying to capture words that were spoken in "tongues" by people who could do it in a dictionary.  This is a problem but since the language is different ("too few rare letters, too many frequent glyph clusters") the often used o could be an artefact of "speaking in tongues"

Why don't you explain the four glyphs in a row JoJo?