11-04-2026, 06:35 AM
Hi oeesordy
I'm not sure if I understood everything correctly
But here are my thoughts on it...
Isn't that a break in the internal logic?
Either d->N (letter) OR d->“Oct” (numeral), but both at will?
Glossolalia as an explanation naturally leads nowhere: If nonsense is the expected result, any substitution can be “confirmed.” Just as a side note: According to previous statistical studies, purely spoken glossolalia can never maintain a structurally rigid system like the one we see in VMS—especially not over 200 pages.
Even if it’s not supposed to make sense, still: Frequency-rank matching between VMS and Latin is known to have failed: The VMS frequency distribution is structurally different from Latin (too few rare letters, too many frequent glyph clusters). This has been tested many times.
But, as I said, I’m not sure if I understood you correctly.
I'm not sure if I understood everything correctly
But here are my thoughts on it... Isn't that a break in the internal logic?
Either d->N (letter) OR d->“Oct” (numeral), but both at will?
Glossolalia as an explanation naturally leads nowhere: If nonsense is the expected result, any substitution can be “confirmed.” Just as a side note: According to previous statistical studies, purely spoken glossolalia can never maintain a structurally rigid system like the one we see in VMS—especially not over 200 pages.
Even if it’s not supposed to make sense, still: Frequency-rank matching between VMS and Latin is known to have failed: The VMS frequency distribution is structurally different from Latin (too few rare letters, too many frequent glyph clusters). This has been tested many times.
But, as I said, I’m not sure if I understood you correctly.