01-11-2016, 05:49 PM
In contrast, it is also interesting to note that the sequence of seventeen symbols, starting with EVA 'o', begins with symbols that are structurally much simpler and some can even be identified with symbols from other symbol systems. In fact, there is one symbol in the VMs sequence that can be connected with symbols of similar form in three other sequences from various historical traditions. This is a triple convergence of interpretation on the fifth symbol in the VMs sequence. Each interpretation is supported by the existence of an objective, positional confirmation built into the the sequence. See threads on convergence and meaningless coincidence.
My feeling is that the area of primary investigation should be at the level of patterns made by *using* the symbols in the sequence, not at the level of patterns used to *make* the symbols in the sequence.
My feeling is that the area of primary investigation should be at the level of patterns made by *using* the symbols in the sequence, not at the level of patterns used to *make* the symbols in the sequence.