The Lullian Apophatic Machine

[eggyk]

Or easier: I also don’t think it’s that familiar with this forum—who said what in what context. It probably wouldn’t be able to poke fun at the individual theories with a wink, the way I did. Nor would she weave in Asterix comparisons, or draw a connection between Vellum and the death of an animal. Etc. that’s not her sense of humor. I don’t know how u got the idea that an AI does that? Maybe u should ask the AI properly—it’s quick to say “that’s AI” when texts are formulated a bit better and more structurally sound.

Just so you know, AI not only knows the users here, but also knows who the highly respected users are, as well as the specific users that are associated with certain theories, as well as the ins and outs of the discussions within those threads. Additionally, including humorous comparisons and poking fun at individual theories is actually a huge marker for AI generated posts, as opposed to the opposite. 

And if you did use AI in the way that you say, that would make the post look AI generated anyway, so i'm not sure why it is a surprise that people are pointing it out.  

What I do claim: this explanation is more coherent than its alternatives. It requires no unknown language. It requires no anachronistic assumptions about how people thought in the early fifteenth century. It explains the statistical properties of the text without magic.

It doesn't explain the statistical properties of the text, right? To do that, you need a somewhat working model/process for generating voynichese text.