This is impossible for a language
#12
(19-03-2026, 04:01 PM)Jorge_Stolfi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(19-03-2026, 03:53 PM)eggyk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Things like "-ly" or "-dly" would get huge coverage too in english. "-lijk" in dutch as well. e?

But the challenge is to find a suffix that may occur in hundreds of words in the same book, and is by itself a word that is more common than all of them.

All the best, --stolfi

Something like "den" or "en" in dutch, perhaps. 

Any noun that ends with "d" will become "den" when pluralised. They both work standalone too:

"en" is extremely common word of course, meaning "and"
"den" is an old version of "de" (at least i think?) which is the definite article "the", but also means pine tree

Both would likely be more common than the suffix version if used that way.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
This is impossible for a language - by oeesordy - 19-03-2026, 05:19 AM
RE: This is impossible for a language - by Mauro - 19-03-2026, 04:33 PM
RE: This is impossible for a language - by oshfdk - 19-03-2026, 09:03 AM
RE: This is impossible for a language - by eggyk - 19-03-2026, 03:53 PM
RE: This is impossible for a language - by eggyk - 19-03-2026, 04:41 PM
RE: This is impossible for a language - by oshfdk - 19-03-2026, 07:57 PM
RE: This is impossible for a language - by Rafal - 19-03-2026, 03:39 PM
RE: This is impossible for a language - by quimqu - 20-03-2026, 08:05 AM
RE: This is impossible for a language - by ReneZ - 20-03-2026, 08:19 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)