18-03-2026, 02:28 AM
(17-03-2026, 05:00 AM)eggyk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(17-03-2026, 04:47 AM)BessAgritianin wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You are not seeing Pareidolia, but real and meaningful explanations, which have been deleted by someone carefully. The question is who had deleted and I have asked it without anyone being able to answer it.
No. The example in this thread was pareidolia and to suggest otherwise in this fashion is totally irresponsible. I literally showed that it was pareidolia from the outline of ink blobs when the image was zoomed out. When zoomed in, the supposed "signature" dissapears.
At any rate, potential secret hidden signatures across the manuscript and their decoding clearly isn't the point of this thread. We're talking about leaves and image processing.
I believe the case I presented was indeed pareidolia BessAgritiannin, its just an artefact of the technology from detection of the ink splatter. I'm not 100% sure, but I trust eggyk analysis. What really made me confused is that Wikipedia said Jan Eyck of Liege had some secret projects. His signature is ornate, but I don't know what his penmanship is like. Pareidolia affects all we want to believe with our eyes and logic, but that can be skewed by the interpreter. Perception is a funny business but the rigors of the scientific method is our best bet so far. I was letting my opinion get in the way and I'm not a pro at this.