09-03-2026, 11:48 AM
Yep, I believe that Rohonc Codex is logographic.
By the way we cannot exclude that Voynich Manuscript is also "logographic" although in such case other descriptions as "nomenclator" or "code" ( You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ) would fit better.
It is only nomenclature but Rohonc words are sometimes iconic - they resemble object they represent and behave this way the same as Chinese signs or Egyptian hieroglyphs while Voynichese words never do it. I would say Logograms refer to a natural script while codes refer to a cipher.
IF Voynichese was logographic/nomenclator/code then such case we should look for patterns and common words that could mean "herb", "leaf", "Sun", "Moon" etc. Unfortunately we cannot spot such patterns.
By the way we cannot exclude that Voynich Manuscript is also "logographic" although in such case other descriptions as "nomenclator" or "code" ( You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ) would fit better.
It is only nomenclature but Rohonc words are sometimes iconic - they resemble object they represent and behave this way the same as Chinese signs or Egyptian hieroglyphs while Voynichese words never do it. I would say Logograms refer to a natural script while codes refer to a cipher.
IF Voynichese was logographic/nomenclator/code then such case we should look for patterns and common words that could mean "herb", "leaf", "Sun", "Moon" etc. Unfortunately we cannot spot such patterns.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)