(22-02-2026, 01:43 PM)Radim Dobeš wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(22-02-2026, 01:23 PM)DG97EEB wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(22-02-2026, 01:05 PM)Radim Dobeš wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The astronomical part of the Voynich manuscript describes a comprehensive description of the workings of the universe and the overall system of the functioning of the earth as presented in the books of Enoch. This is a very complex and comprehensive model with a different model of the functioning of the world. The Enochian model is geocentric and not heliocentric.
Interesting comparison, and the visual parallel between the 12-gate system in 1 Enoch 72-82 and the circular layout on f67v2 is very striking, although I should note very far from unique. The uniqueness is using human faces as moon phases (if indeed that's what it is).
Question for you. What's the earliest known transmission date of 1&2 Enoch to Europe? Wikipedia says 1773, which as interesting as your theory is, makes it less tenable. Do you have sources showing an earlier source or are you suggesting that the whole manuscript was created in Ethiopia? In which case, there's rather a lot of Caucasian nymphs...
I already wrote here that the books were lost and rediscovered, but there are Vatican fragments and other clues. See the older part of the thread. I am sending my other comparison for the 12 gates.
I think the author or authors were from Europe and must have been very educated in many fields. They could have worked in a library and had access to these books there.
I'm sorry Radim, but you wrote this yourself
"Content and "heresy": The book tells of angels (Guardians) who descended to earth, had sex with human women, and fathered giants (Nephilim), which was problematic and mystical from the point of view of the theology of the time.
Rediscovery: The entire text was rediscovered in Europe only in the 18th century (brought from Ethiopia), so in the 15th century it was a book that did not exist in Western consciousness, or was considered apocryphal (outside the canon).
In the 15th century, you would probably not have come across the 1st Book of Enoch in a regular European library or in heretical writings of the time"
You have zero transmission evidence and a completely unsubstantiated theory. Even one example in a medieval book would do. Just one
As for the visual evidence, whilst compelling in isolation, there are literally hundreds of German and Italian books (not to mention Arabic) that share these same motifs. They don't need any kind of special pleading or elaborate transmission story to work. Occam's Razor applies here, as does Hitchens's Razor.. "That which can be put forward without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence "

