Two Preprints: Bayesian Model Selection ($\Href$) & Cognitive Mechanism (The Zero-Pat

[durdanovic]

How did you use AI in producing these two papers?  We have a prohibition on theories and papers that were assisted by LLM chatbots like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude because their current models are invariably producing AI slop when used for anything more than pure translation.

A lot in your papers is going over my head to be fair...but I'm concerned from reading the conclusions in particular that this is AI slop.

I let the paper(s) speak for themselves, if the math is over your head,that is not my problem.

You know damn-well that the math is not over her head -- the math is nonsense just like the rest of the paper.

You do not understand it yourself. You cannot explain it in your own words, you cannot walk anyone through its pseudo-logic, and you cannot defend it as legitimate research. Yet you still publish it and present it as if it were the result of your own effort, expecting people to give you credit for something you neither produced nor understand. Anyone who behaves that way has serious mental and emotional problems and needs to get help.

Your only response is a snide pathetic remark to a legitimate question that was put to you.

If you have a question about the paper, ask! If you think math is nonsense, I suggest you actually read the books I cited on information theory, bayesian inference, machine learning, etc. Of course it is my own effort! You can not even engage with the paper, your only resort is to attack the author.
I repeat, if you have a question about the math, deductive chain, statistical fingerprint, etc, ask. I have +35 years of actual hands on experience in those domains..