28-10-2016, 02:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 28-10-2016, 02:28 AM by ThomasCoon.)
Can I say, Tom - I am always impressed by your perseverance and your continual striving to figure out the mystery of the code. You have continued to go forward when many people have given up.
I think David's critique is a fair one - if we are not limited to the Welsh noun for "Pisces", but can also add or subtract the definite article (y), use alternate spellings, and count attributes like "water", then the system may be too loose. It is hard to disprove that we've found anything specific, because anything at all can be found under this system. That is why I am a little skeptical. But perhaps I've misinterpreted. At any rate, your effort is commendable!
I think David's critique is a fair one - if we are not limited to the Welsh noun for "Pisces", but can also add or subtract the definite article (y), use alternate spellings, and count attributes like "water", then the system may be too loose. It is hard to disprove that we've found anything specific, because anything at all can be found under this system. That is why I am a little skeptical. But perhaps I've misinterpreted. At any rate, your effort is commendable!


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)