24-01-2026, 01:53 AM
I believe folio 93r is next to a missing bifolio and is among the MSI scans, but if the bifolio was lost very soon after the manuscript's creation, I'm not hopeful for much of an offset. I'm assuming we would have a much better chance with the two that were cut out centuries later, 12 and 74. 12 would just be another couple plants from the section of the manuscript we already have the most of, but 74 would potentially give more zodiac illustrations to estimate the date and location of the manuscript with.