07-12-2025, 06:56 PM
Instead of trying to “translate” the strange symbols into words, I studied how they behave where they appear, how they repeat, and how they change in different parts of the book. What I found is that the symbols act more like steps in a procedure than like letters or words.
Different parts of the manuscript (plants, jars, zodiac wheels, bathing diagrams, etc.) all seem to follow the same set of rules, as if they were describing similar kinds of processes but in different contexts.
The document puts all of these repeating patterns together into one system. It shows:
The Voynich Manuscript may not be a coded language at all, but a symbolic way of describing steps in making or preparing things.
Different parts of the manuscript (plants, jars, zodiac wheels, bathing diagrams, etc.) all seem to follow the same set of rules, as if they were describing similar kinds of processes but in different contexts.
The document puts all of these repeating patterns together into one system. It shows:
- what each type of symbol seems to “do”
- how they combine into instructions
- how the same rules show up in every section
- and how the whole manuscript might represent a consistent technical or practical system
The Voynich Manuscript may not be a coded language at all, but a symbolic way of describing steps in making or preparing things.