Anyone who cannot see potential religious influences in the VMs is not paying sufficient attention to the subtleties of the illustrations. You can see what you want in the VMs critter, but it's still a *three-part* puzzle. It's Click > click > click => Ca-ching. If there's a clunk, there's no ca-ching.
The structure of the three-part VMs illustration matches that of BNF Fr. 13096. The Apocalypse of S Jean
This book was owned by the Valois Dukes of Burgundy, though it may have been loaned out. Books have a life of their own.
Other comparable texts are also apocalyptic. Astrology is somewhat relevant for parts 1 & 2. But it fails on part three, which is the droplets of blood. Blood is uncommon in Agnus Dei representations and when shown in alternate examples, it does not cross the cosmic band barrier. So, the third part not only needs to be correctly identified but correctly positioned as well.
And the Powerball is:::: The marriage to Ecclesia. If you get something right, then other things have a better chance to make sense.
The problem is compounded. The artistry is second rate. The artist was intentionally deceptive. The investigator may be unfamiliar with the reference that was made by the VMs artist. Once that gets straightened out; it's obvious. See above.
The structure of the three-part VMs illustration matches that of BNF Fr. 13096. The Apocalypse of S Jean
This book was owned by the Valois Dukes of Burgundy, though it may have been loaned out. Books have a life of their own.
Other comparable texts are also apocalyptic. Astrology is somewhat relevant for parts 1 & 2. But it fails on part three, which is the droplets of blood. Blood is uncommon in Agnus Dei representations and when shown in alternate examples, it does not cross the cosmic band barrier. So, the third part not only needs to be correctly identified but correctly positioned as well.
And the Powerball is:::: The marriage to Ecclesia. If you get something right, then other things have a better chance to make sense.
The problem is compounded. The artistry is second rate. The artist was intentionally deceptive. The investigator may be unfamiliar with the reference that was made by the VMs artist. Once that gets straightened out; it's obvious. See above.