23-11-2025, 12:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 23-11-2025, 12:13 AM by Bluetoes101.)
No image in the manuscript will be identified without the writing. (This is a lie.. we have suns and moons etc, but I think you get the point 
)
But I sit in between those who think this animal can be identified and those who think we must link it all. If we linked the pattern on the animal to the page, it is flowing water. Its the same pattern on the right. So linking this didn't really help. But if we consider it just like a marginal drawing, like in books of hours etc, the animal, the band, the lines and the woman with the ring might make up that drawing / story. It could have nothing at all to do with anything else. So while we don't know, we must just pick a path that seems sensible. To me that is "these things that seem together" rather than everything, because that is nothing... because we don't know, and will never really know until someone cracks the writing.
) But I sit in between those who think this animal can be identified and those who think we must link it all. If we linked the pattern on the animal to the page, it is flowing water. Its the same pattern on the right. So linking this didn't really help. But if we consider it just like a marginal drawing, like in books of hours etc, the animal, the band, the lines and the woman with the ring might make up that drawing / story. It could have nothing at all to do with anything else. So while we don't know, we must just pick a path that seems sensible. To me that is "these things that seem together" rather than everything, because that is nothing... because we don't know, and will never really know until someone cracks the writing.