19-11-2025, 06:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-11-2025, 07:45 PM by Bluetoes101.)
Something that I think probably doesn't get accounted for enough, is the manuscript it self.
There's a lot of "squinting" at "it", but if you turn the page backwards there is a curled up "deer-like" animal that certainly does not curl up in self defence.
Then there are several animals, including a human/animal.. thingy, and the painter chooses green only for the lizard(-thing).
It just seems a bit baffling if you were to sit and "read it", first you would see a curled up "deer" and a green "lizard" then see a green curled up thing and go "Armadillo?".
.. just think we might be shouting over the top of the manuscript.
Granted, the blue rat-thing does not help my case..
[Edit - also R. Sale's point above]
There's a lot of "squinting" at "it", but if you turn the page backwards there is a curled up "deer-like" animal that certainly does not curl up in self defence.
Then there are several animals, including a human/animal.. thingy, and the painter chooses green only for the lizard(-thing).
It just seems a bit baffling if you were to sit and "read it", first you would see a curled up "deer" and a green "lizard" then see a green curled up thing and go "Armadillo?".
.. just think we might be shouting over the top of the manuscript.
Granted, the blue rat-thing does not help my case..
[Edit - also R. Sale's point above]