How could you prove that VM is gibberish?

[Mark Knowles]

And it could be, as Mark says, that Voynich is mostly meaningless but there is still some info hidden among the noise.

I have been studying the text of the Voynich in detail which research I will present as soon as I am ready. I believe two things to be true.
1) There are some meaningless or null words.
2) Not all words are meaningless or null.

Therefore obviously words fall into two categories: meaningless and meaningful. The percentage of words in each category is hard to estimate. It seems to me most plausible that the majority of words are meaningless leaving a minority of words that are meaningful. My best guess is that about 80% are meaningless and 20% are meaningful, but it could be 90% meaningless and 10% meaningful or 60% meaningless and 40% meaningful.