09-10-2025, 06:58 PM
Got a response and it's not what I was expecting at all. I'll post it in text as I dont know how to upload a screenshot. If someone can tell me I'll post it as well.
Icy-Tradition7656
"Hi thanks for reaching out!
I'll clear this up right now.
Clusters like “olad otolshade” were conceptual examples to illustrate how the framework interprets functional roles of EVA words. I should have made that clearer, that’s on me, and I’ll edit the two posts where olad or otolshade appears to clarify. The exact phrase doesn’t appear in the manuscript, but the framework logic still applies: repeating clusters near diagrams, their placement, and visual cues determine their functional role. The interpretation process works the same way even if you replaced the whole transliteration with a made-up language, structure is key.
Everything you see comes out of the Skeleton Key Framework, which I built myself from scratch and had to forcibly publicly publish because people were stealing my work. I put raw data through it, interpret the results, and write it up in my own words. That’s all me. What I do use AI for is purely restructuring my full post into a format I prefer; nothing in the content is altered.
The issue is people keep calling anything they don’t understand “AI.” If it looks analytical or structured, they just assume a machine did it. There are plenty of posts/responses on the .ninja forum where even the writers/commenters don't even bother removing the AI em dashes, and that goes through just fine. But that’s not how this works. I’ve been transparent from the start; every step I post can be retraced and reproduced.
So if someone really thinks it’s “AI slop,” fine. Prove it: run the data, check the sources, show where it doesn’t line up."
Icy-Tradition7656
"Hi thanks for reaching out!
I'll clear this up right now.
Clusters like “olad otolshade” were conceptual examples to illustrate how the framework interprets functional roles of EVA words. I should have made that clearer, that’s on me, and I’ll edit the two posts where olad or otolshade appears to clarify. The exact phrase doesn’t appear in the manuscript, but the framework logic still applies: repeating clusters near diagrams, their placement, and visual cues determine their functional role. The interpretation process works the same way even if you replaced the whole transliteration with a made-up language, structure is key.
Everything you see comes out of the Skeleton Key Framework, which I built myself from scratch and had to forcibly publicly publish because people were stealing my work. I put raw data through it, interpret the results, and write it up in my own words. That’s all me. What I do use AI for is purely restructuring my full post into a format I prefer; nothing in the content is altered.
The issue is people keep calling anything they don’t understand “AI.” If it looks analytical or structured, they just assume a machine did it. There are plenty of posts/responses on the .ninja forum where even the writers/commenters don't even bother removing the AI em dashes, and that goes through just fine. But that’s not how this works. I’ve been transparent from the start; every step I post can be retraced and reproduced.
So if someone really thinks it’s “AI slop,” fine. Prove it: run the data, check the sources, show where it doesn’t line up."