30-08-2025, 10:55 PM
I believe others have data regarding "word" and "subject" relationships, I would fish them out and see what they found and what you can add.
The Takahashi transcription is fine if you want to use it, but its rather old now and has quite a few errors. No transcription is perfect and I would say to learn the makeup of each glyph (if you do not already) and check the manuscript itself where possible. I find Rene's to be better in general - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It's not a bad line of research to go down or be interested in at all, you just got hoodwinked by ChatGPT on this run, I look forward to seeing the next, good luck with it
The Takahashi transcription is fine if you want to use it, but its rather old now and has quite a few errors. No transcription is perfect and I would say to learn the makeup of each glyph (if you do not already) and check the manuscript itself where possible. I find Rene's to be better in general - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It's not a bad line of research to go down or be interested in at all, you just got hoodwinked by ChatGPT on this run, I look forward to seeing the next, good luck with it