Speculative fraud hypothesis

[Torsten]

There was no need to invent an artificial “gibberish generation” mechanism. As D’Imperio already observed [...]

She was not stating a fact. She was proposing her version of the "hoax" theory.  Which, in general terms, apparently is the same as yours.  Which has the same problems as yours.

Actually, D’Imperio specifically described the practice of concealing an encrypted message within a longer dummy text. In doing so, she noted that scribes confronted with such a task would typically generate meaningless text by repeating parts of neighboring strings with various small changes.

This is what D'Imperio wrote (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.):