(21-08-2025, 06:30 PM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(21-08-2025, 05:05 PM)Mauro wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I also followed oshfdk's suggestion above and worked with the different sections of the manuscript, finding the same disappointing behaviour. Moreover, all the 'best' grammars for one section perform poorly on the other sections and on the manuscript as a whole, and they have structures different from the 'best overall' shown above (ie. [n m] may not cluster with the other characters, [y] may not be duplicated, etc.).
I think this is very interesting. Could you publish samples of best grammars for different sections?
Sure, give me one day though, I did not plan for this and it needs some work to put it in a readable form.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)