01-08-2025, 07:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-08-2025, 07:18 PM by RobGea.
Edit Reason: clarity
)
Using Isidore of Sevilles' - "The cosmos and its parts" from a ""what's up" perspective to describe f67v2 seems like a fair intepretation.
There are 3 points i'd like to add.
1. Isidore makes no mention of the 4 things at the outer edge of the drawing ( theres varying voynichero ideas for these ).
2. Isidore says 2 portals for the Sun, there are 2 extra here , though by extension we could say that these are the 2 portals for the Moon. ( idk how valid that would be ).
3. Isidores definitions suck.
If we ditch "sky' entirely then we would have:
Air --> where the birds are.
Firmament --> where the sun and moon are.
Ether --> where the stars are ( and it is sphere shaped ).
Then we can just replace 'Sky' for "Firmament" in your annotated diagram and we are done.
There are 3 points i'd like to add.
1. Isidore makes no mention of the 4 things at the outer edge of the drawing ( theres varying voynichero ideas for these ).
2. Isidore says 2 portals for the Sun, there are 2 extra here , though by extension we could say that these are the 2 portals for the Moon. ( idk how valid that would be ).
3. Isidores definitions suck.
If we ditch "sky' entirely then we would have:
Air --> where the birds are.
Firmament --> where the sun and moon are.
Ether --> where the stars are ( and it is sphere shaped ).
Then we can just replace 'Sky' for "Firmament" in your annotated diagram and we are done.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)