24-07-2025, 04:22 AM
I agree. The ice is thin in many places, but is it thin *everywhere*? And why is it thin? It is just as you say, interpretations are made that cannot be tested because they are based on appearance and appearance is subjective.
What can be done to help verify interpretations and identify factors that are not subjective, but objective? Structure is objective.
All the cosmic diagrams in the comparison share the same basic structural elements:
All three central Earths have an inverted T-O construction. All three Earths are surrounded by a field of stars. In all three cosmic diagrams, the field of stars is surrounded by a cosmic boundary. Each of these criteria is falsifiable. Each statement is either valid, or it is not. Each of the three cosmic diagrams conforms to the requirements, despite the strong visual disparity in the appearance of the VMs cosmos. So, it's not a question of someone's opinion, it's a statement of fact. And given that the structure used in these comparative examples is highly unusual for the era of the VMs C-14 dates or earlier and there is similar provenance for the two historical sources, this strongly suggests [IMHO] that the ice here is thick enough to stand on.
What can be done to help verify interpretations and identify factors that are not subjective, but objective? Structure is objective.
All the cosmic diagrams in the comparison share the same basic structural elements:
All three central Earths have an inverted T-O construction. All three Earths are surrounded by a field of stars. In all three cosmic diagrams, the field of stars is surrounded by a cosmic boundary. Each of these criteria is falsifiable. Each statement is either valid, or it is not. Each of the three cosmic diagrams conforms to the requirements, despite the strong visual disparity in the appearance of the VMs cosmos. So, it's not a question of someone's opinion, it's a statement of fact. And given that the structure used in these comparative examples is highly unusual for the era of the VMs C-14 dates or earlier and there is similar provenance for the two historical sources, this strongly suggests [IMHO] that the ice here is thick enough to stand on.