22-06-2025, 06:05 PM
(22-06-2025, 05:50 PM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If a large portion of the manuscript was gibberish created by randomly stringing filler words, I would expect a lot of coincidental repetitions. It's hard to produce pages and pages of gibberish without repeating oneself.
I would expect that each page would contain some filler text and some real text with the larger proportion being filler. So, I doubt there would be any pages with just filler text and no real text. Likewise, I doubt there would be any pages with just real text and no filler text.
So, I suspect the gibberish would be interspersed with real words. The question of how gibberish text was produced is akin to the question that people who argue the manuscript is a hoax and therefore all gibberish have to address.

