11-06-2025, 12:24 AM
(10-06-2025, 11:36 PM)davidma wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(10-06-2025, 10:46 PM)Rafal wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.For me the surprising section is quireT, which seems different from the rest, having the quality score much higher and similar to real texts.
QuireT has about 10000 vords while the others about 1500, I wonder if this impacts the score. I must have also missed where he said that but it would be good to get an actual folio split for the quires/sections analysed.
I do think the fact that the 10000 vord quire scores so closely to the vulgata text and so far from the randomised genesis is a good indicator of some sort of meaning or at least a structured relationship between vords. I think the paper "gibberish after all" showed that Voynich behaviour could be coherent with a sort of asemic writing rather than a purely randomised text. I guess now we only need 38000 words of asemic writing to compare
It might also be because the quire analysis only uses 7 groups, where I think based on the analusis run on genesis shows that 18 is closer to the reality of indo european languages.
I can do a run with 18 groups tomorrow, see what the score is then.


