ol most likely translates to "Io" using Latin

[anyasophira]

it’s not a bad theory if you only look at how Latin letters behave.  You need to also look at how Eva o and Eva l behave both together and apart. ( I don’t know how to use the glyph symbol). Eva l in particular does not like to behave. It often goes against most patterns in the research I’ve read.  Does the Latin o behave similar as it composes new words in different meanings?You should compare how the Latin letters act together and apart in words and then compare them to how the vords act. See if that also matches up. That would lend more support  and if it doesn’t you can can still gain valuable info on the nature of these two glyphs.