27-05-2025, 11:04 PM
I had a look at these groups from the Book of Genesis and they actually make sense
They are not perfect but the method clearly finds some real patterns. It won't find detailed stuff like "human own names" or "personality traits" but it seems to roughly find parts of speech like nouns, verbs, adjectives or conjuntions. As I said it's not 100% perfect, but feels high above random stuff.
I would have a question Davidd. Do you have any statistical simple measure that would tell us how "good" these groups are? Something like correlation coefficient ot some measure of total variance explained?
I wonder if you could do a comparison for:
- Book of Genesis
- some ungrammatical text (could be Book of Genesis with scrambled word order)
- Voynich Manuscript
and see how good are the found groups. Is Voynich more similar to grammatical or ungrammatical text?
They are not perfect but the method clearly finds some real patterns. It won't find detailed stuff like "human own names" or "personality traits" but it seems to roughly find parts of speech like nouns, verbs, adjectives or conjuntions. As I said it's not 100% perfect, but feels high above random stuff.
I would have a question Davidd. Do you have any statistical simple measure that would tell us how "good" these groups are? Something like correlation coefficient ot some measure of total variance explained?
I wonder if you could do a comparison for:
- Book of Genesis
- some ungrammatical text (could be Book of Genesis with scrambled word order)
- Voynich Manuscript
and see how good are the found groups. Is Voynich more similar to grammatical or ungrammatical text?


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)