28-04-2025, 04:03 PM
Ah but if you assume EVA-o is o, then why isn't EVA-d s or d? And EVA-a, a? And EVA-r, r? They all have similar counterparts in regular Latin texts, just like o does.
So then we're looking at vodar or vosar. That in turn would imply that you now discovered readings for several glyphs. Then you'll end up on Tavi's list and we have to explain why the theory doesn't work.
(An admittedly dramatic way of saying: why assume o is o?)
So then we're looking at vodar or vosar. That in turn would imply that you now discovered readings for several glyphs. Then you'll end up on Tavi's list and we have to explain why the theory doesn't work.
(An admittedly dramatic way of saying: why assume o is o?)


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)