f85v and 86(part): using the Voynich Map

[Stefan Wirtz_2]

Great, thats better to do:



A is the boulder itself. Medieval artists sometimes placed their faces, names, a legend or something like a symbol onto positions that were not important for the whole artwork. So I assume the TO wheel landed here.

B/5: the cliffwall, looking like vertical waves and very blueish.

C: as I said, this is the best foto I could get. All tourists make videos and images of other places, this seems not interesting.

There is a wandering path leading to the right and up, up there is an old monastery to visit, so it was probably used before, but without good sight and after 600years of forest growth there is no chance to say more about 1,6,7 and C. Surely, the boulder can be reached by taking some path across the debris.

2: the downfall rubble (earlier with less trees und bushes, I suppose)

3: same problem as C, 1, 6,7, intensive plant growth and no clear sight to say something

4:the breach in the cliff

8: he just drawed the trees around that bolder, they were surely upcoming after 20 years or still stood after to earth fall. This rocks look rather old, that may have happened long before 1400AD and is impressive enough to be cartographed.

Alone this constellation at the southwest is quite unique, sorry I thought that is rather obvious. Having such a detail still lying there after 600 years gives a good push to "mangup identification", I think.

Just in case:



Again, after 600 years of foresting, agriculturing, erosion, coming from a time were proper perspective, dimensions and accuracy were still to be invented for drawings, and maybe an artist who did this from his memory, it is quite near to today. Even that path seems to be there.
Problem is to find winter fotos were the trees carry no leafs. Tourists produce summer images, even the satellite views from all major onlineservices show quite different qualities.