14-04-2025, 05:31 PM
(14-04-2025, 04:59 PM)Stefan Wirtz_2 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This is not using EVA, it is dumping it. EVA never worked at all.
If so, what valid words did it ever produce?
Which single letters are confirmed and how?
Who ever „agreed upon EVA“, and why?
EVA is a transliteration alphabet made in a way to allow easy pronunciation of Voynichese glyph sequences. EVA was never intended to represent sounds of some underlying language, as far as I know.
I don't find your argument convincing, translating "European", "African" and "Asian" (instead of Europe/Europa, etc.) to Uzbek doesn't show any ground for interpreting EVA-L as L to me. In Uzbek this is clearly a universal suffix -lik, similar to -ean/-an in English, there is no shared suffix in these Voynichese words. Overall, you mapping looks very patchy. I think it's a pity given that you started with a very solid argument regarding high likelihood of Europe/Africa/Asia having these or similar pronunciations for a wide range of possible underlying languages.