I thought these were typos but I was mistaken. These are examples of code compression, avoiding the repetition of the prefix (first letter) of a 2-letter code when it is the same in the next code:
GTMOLRR/O = GTMOLRLR/O (hello)
GKT/O = GKGT/O (who)
KLRO/SSNO/KLOR = /KLRLO/S/SNO/KLOLR (classical)
NO/ONRO/K = NO/ONRNO/K (ionic)
KORNORMTNOLONR = /K/O/RNONRMTNOLONR (corinthian)
That's really tricky and I'm not sure how it works in some cases.
For example why should 4TO (7th word) not be interpreted as 4T4O (thi)?
Maybe 4TO is a typo: it should be MTO.
The state is not binary, it is simply the current prefix (/, 4, G, L, M, N).
All codes are two-letter codes but the first letter of the code is omitted when it is the same as the previous one.
GTMOLRR/O = GTMOLRLR/O (hello)
GKT/O = GKGT/O (who)
KLRO/SSNO/KLOR = /KLRLO/S/SNO/KLOLR (classical)
NO/ONRO/K = NO/ONRNO/K (ionic)
KORNORMTNOLONR = /K/O/RNONRMTNOLONR (corinthian)
That's really tricky and I'm not sure how it works in some cases.
For example why should 4TO (7th word) not be interpreted as 4T4O (thi)?
Maybe 4TO is a typo: it should be MTO.
The state is not binary, it is simply the current prefix (/, 4, G, L, M, N).
All codes are two-letter codes but the first letter of the code is omitted when it is the same as the previous one.