To me, it looks worse. This word could be used to cast doubt on just about every possible theory about the meaning or the structure of words.
Also, the third and fourth character do not really look the same. The fourth is like an intermediate form between the 'normal' Eva s to its left, and the left half of Eva sh to its right. We can't be sure that it is intentional, but it certainly looks like it was written carefully.
To top it off, this word includes the very rare picnic table.
If the whole manuscript were like this, Antonio Garcia Jimenez would have a good point. However, this is an exception.
The way out: this isn't a word but a list of symbols. One can see such in other manuscripts, e.g. the "Buch der heiligen Dreifaltigkeit" (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.).
Also, the third and fourth character do not really look the same. The fourth is like an intermediate form between the 'normal' Eva s to its left, and the left half of Eva sh to its right. We can't be sure that it is intentional, but it certainly looks like it was written carefully.
To top it off, this word includes the very rare picnic table.
If the whole manuscript were like this, Antonio Garcia Jimenez would have a good point. However, this is an exception.
The way out: this isn't a word but a list of symbols. One can see such in other manuscripts, e.g. the "Buch der heiligen Dreifaltigkeit" (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.).

