[split] f85r2

[Searcher]

The current paradigm for VM imagery research is this: assume that everything is intentional and meaningful, and that this meaning can be recovered through speculation.

This approach, to which I also contributed, is not likely to ever lead to any broadly shared insights or consensus.

And who said that consensus will lead anywhere? None of us knows what is truly meaningful in the MS and what is not, and where everyone's path will lead. I'm talking about image analysis, of course.