02-02-2025, 01:30 PM
(02-02-2025, 12:16 PM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(02-02-2025, 10:27 AM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm not aware of a single reading that would successfully produce a meaningful and grammatically sound phrase.
I am aware of several, but it depends a bit on what one should consider 'gramatically sound'.
Perhaps one should not place the bar too high.
Writing ungramaticaly unsound is common today but they're is no reason to think that this is something new.
Then maybe someone could take these interpretations to answer the question of whether marginalia uses some specific subset of Latin characters or not.
(02-02-2025, 06:36 AM)RadioFM wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Without digressing from the subforum's maintopic: Is the marginalia largely written using a subset of characters or am I reading in too much? I know the amount of marginalia text is laughably small to make any reliable inferences, but I see a lot of initial m's and p's and final x's and r's. "gas mich" actually stands out as being remarkably different from the rest of the words. Again, it could just be pen tests, spells, or it could simply be me high on goat milk and qokain.

