New video: "Is the Voynich Manuscript fake?"

[Mark Knowles]

It might be nice to have a list of these that are illustrated, but not digitized.

Yes, this would be an interesting line of investigation to pick up again. Probably things have changed in the years since I wrote that post. Looking at the Handscriftencensus: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. , it appears that a lot of the current entries are marked as fragments, which is a shame. 

I'll have a better look at this next year

I also mentioned those as part of a more general point. It would be nice if everytime someone comes across a manuscript or document that is not digitised and which they think is interesting they could add it to a list with a brief reason why they think it is interesting. This might help towards making in roads into the non-digitised world of manuscripts and documents relevant to Voynich research. I don't think we can afford or should ignore the non-digitised world. Obviously, manuscripts whose existence we don't know about either, as they don't appear in inventories or their listing gives no clear indication of the nature of the manuscript, such that we wouldn't know it is of interest to Voynich research, can only be discovered by luck searching through an archive. Though we can still identity archives which might be more suitable for searching.