(30-11-2024, 02:25 PM)bi3mw wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Do you mean this article?
O`Neill. Hugh, 1944, "Botanical Observations on the Vovnich MS," Speculum Vol. 19, January, p. 126
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
That can't be all, right? He just says "quite plainly a sunflower" and that's it then. I'm afraid to say that Peter Tentakulus makes a better case than O'Neil & His Botanist Six. I'm not saying it must be a leek, but something like it is objectively a better option: the leaves are sheathing, narrow and with smooth edges. Sunflowers leaves are set on stalks, heart shaped, broad, with serrated edges. Basically all parameters are off. That's why I would have liked to read a deeper analysis by O'Neil apart from "it's clearly a sunflower and my friends agree". These guys were theorists.

