29-11-2024, 08:45 AM
Interesting, thank you!
At first I was a bit confused as the 'first missing word' did not match mine, but I based the checks on the reference transliteration (RF-1a).
My present thinking (as reflected in the music paper) goes more into the direction of a looped grammar.
I called the result of each loop a 'word chunk'.
However, I do not yet have a good result.
I wondered after first seeing M.Zattera's work, if the efficiency figure is not penalising the results too much.
After all, a perfect word generation rule should not be expected to exist.
But I also don't have a better suggestion.
At first I was a bit confused as the 'first missing word' did not match mine, but I based the checks on the reference transliteration (RF-1a).
My present thinking (as reflected in the music paper) goes more into the direction of a looped grammar.
I called the result of each loop a 'word chunk'.
However, I do not yet have a good result.
I wondered after first seeing M.Zattera's work, if the efficiency figure is not penalising the results too much.
After all, a perfect word generation rule should not be expected to exist.
But I also don't have a better suggestion.