20-11-2024, 10:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 20-11-2024, 11:50 PM by Mark Knowles.)
(19-11-2024, 03:27 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.That does not mean that we must ignore art history and let our imagination run free.
How do feel that I am ignoring art history? I have obviously used a lot of imagination/thought in my own analysis of the page, which I don't see as problematic. I like to think that I have applied my imagination within a logical framework. I hope to elaborate the steps that I went through in constructing the theory step by step. I started from Nick Pelling's identifications and despite my initial considerable doubts found them very plausible, although I certainly came over time to disagree with him regarding the Central Rosette.
(19-11-2024, 03:27 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Just a personal impression, it seems to me that everybody has their own ideas about the Rosettes page, even people who usually try to avoid peculating.
The idea that the page is a map is obviously a theory that a number of people have expounded over the years. Though of course there have been varied opinions as to where it is a map of.

